5 Comments
Feb 19Liked by Matthew Kory

The best news is that Casas is under team control for (I believe) 5 more years. That gives them at least a year to feel more certain about his ability. You don’t want it to drag on too long but why get in a financial bind? I like him a lot but he’s no Ortiz.

Expand full comment
Feb 19Liked by Matthew Kory

It's a guessing game. Projections are just that. What did Ortiz's projections look like at age 24? The team has to decide on a philosophy and go for it. The Braves are locking up all the young guys long term. The risk is they turn out to suck. The reward is they don't suck and you have Acuna for discounted money. The likeliest scenario is probably in between. Braves seem to be getting it right with everyone being good but that could change if guys get hurt or suddenly slow down. It's working early though.

If we want to do this with our guys it may work sometimes and not work other times. I tend to lean towards doing it though because let's say Casas is good for 5 year but sucks after and we signed him for 10 years. You might say - oh no we have him locked up for 5 years of suck. But his salary for those 5 years will look a lot lower relative to other player salaries than it does now, so we might be able to afford to keep him even though he's meh because he isn't making premium player dough, and with a contract that's below market he's probably also tradeable. Welcome to the Royals, son.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Matt.

I love Casas’ hitting upside, but as you note, he’s a 1b, and possibly a future DH. Unless the savings really work in Sox’ favor, I wouldn’t be in a huge rush to extend him. They have time.

Expand full comment