Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ray's avatar

I'm not sure I buy that Kirby/Gilbert are available. They're both excellent, ie there's really no reason for the team to sour on them. The M's have a young core and have been banging on the door of the playoffs the past couple of years... trading either of those guys for prospects would be a step backward. Instead, your point about "trading them to improve their offense" is more reasonable... but I think that inevitably means that the chip that Breslow would have to dangle there is Casas. And I'm not sure that's going to happen. (But if it does, there's your spot to keep Turner!)

Good piece, thanks as always.

Expand full comment
Walt in Maryland's avatar

Thanks, Matt.

I enjoyed traveling down the rabbit hole with you. Lots to unpack, but I’d like to focus on the Turner situation.

He had an excellent season for the Sox, but it was always likely to be a 1-year situation. Even his creative contract was designed to essentially pay him $15 million for 1 year while spreading the salary over 2 seasons for luxury tax purposes.

Two reasons why it’s time to say goodbye.

1. His 2 primary defensive positions are manned by Boston’s best players.

2. It’s not a good idea for this team to use a full-time DH. (Also why a JDM reunion makes no sense)

The Red Sox need to use their DH spot to improve their defense by getting weaker defenders off the field. I’d like to see Yoshida used as a DH at least half the time.

Casas and Devers could also DH occasionally, along with whatever RHH they acquire to replace Turner and Duvall.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts